MEOK vs Credo AI

Credo AI is an enterprise AI governance platform with strong policy-management workflows, risk assessment dashboards, and committee-grade reporting. MEOK is the open-source MCP + signed-attestation infrastructure layer. Credo helps an AI governance committee run their process; MEOK gives engineers cryptographic evidence drop-in their agent stack.

Yes — Credo's policy + dashboard surface is the management view; MEOK's signed certificates are the verifiable evidence layer that flows into those dashboards. A typical large enterprise might use both: Credo for AI governance committee workflow, MEOK for the cryptographically signed evidence that backs each policy decision.

Credo AI is enterprise-tier ($30K-$100K+ annual contracts). MEOK starts free (8 MIT MCPs on PyPI) and scales to £149/mo Pro / £999/mo Defence. MEOK is appropriate for pre-Series-C AI startups and mid-market companies; Credo is appropriate for Fortune 500 AI governance committees.

No. As of April 2026, Credo's roadmap covers EU AI Act + ISO/IEC 42001 + NIST AI RMF policy management. The transparency layer (Article 50 watermarking via Code of Practice 2-layer requirements), DORA, NIS2, and EU CRA are not on Credo's roadmap. MEOK ships all four.

Pick Credo if your committee needs deep policy/risk-assessment workflow software. Pick MEOK if your engineering team needs drop-in evidence-generation MCPs that produce cryptographic certificates auditors can verify by URL. Many enterprises run both side-by-side at very different price points.