
CSOAI
Initializing...
Free forever · No credit card

CSOAI
Initializing...
Article 5 is the EU AI Act's hard floor. Eight categories of AI practice are banned outright, regardless of whether you call yourself a provider or a deployer. Penalty ceiling is the highest in the regulation. Already fully applicable — no Digital Omnibus delay for this article.
Article 5 prohibitions have been fully applicable since 2 February 2025 with no grace period. They were always Phase 1 of the EU AI Act timeline. The Digital Omnibus did NOT delay Article 5 — only the Annex III high-risk obligations and Annex I product-safety obligations got pushed.
Article 5(1)(a)-(h) bans: (a) subliminal / manipulative techniques causing significant harm, (b) exploitation of vulnerabilities (age, disability, social/economic situation), (c) social scoring by public + private actors that leads to detrimental treatment, (d) predictive policing based solely on profiling natural persons, (e) untargeted scraping of facial images from internet/CCTV to build facial-recognition databases, (f) emotion recognition in workplace + education (with narrow medical/safety exceptions), (g) biometric categorisation inferring sensitive attributes (race, political views, sexuality, religion), (h) real-time remote biometric identification in publicly accessible spaces for law enforcement (with narrow national-security exceptions and judicial authorisation).
Article 99(3) sets the maximum fine for Article 5 violations at €35M or 7% of total worldwide annual turnover (whichever is higher). This is the highest band in the regulation. Sanctions are imposed by national supervisory authorities + the EU AI Office for systemic providers.
Each member state designates a national supervisory authority. France: CNIL + Arcom + ANSSI sharing competence. Germany: BNetzA + BSI + Datenschutzbehörden. Italy: ACN + Garante. The EU AI Office (DG CONNECT) coordinates cross-border + GPAI matters.
Article 5(1)(f) carves out workplace + education emotion recognition explicitly except 'where the use of the AI system is intended to be put in place or into the market for medical or safety reasons.' Driver-fatigue detection in commercial vehicles is the canonical safety case. Plant-floor anomaly detection that incidentally observes worker emotion is borderline — document the intended purpose carefully and prefer non-emotion-based proxies.
Source: EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Art. 5 · MEOK AI Labs · CSOAI LTD · UK Companies House 16939677