Evidence pack · for underwriters & risk teams

AI-system measurement you can verify, offline, with no account.

One signed measurement card below. Fetch it, verify it, keep it. Every number traces to a live, replayable measurement — never to a claim we ask you to take on trust.

Step 1 — fetch a signed measurement card

A card is a ~3 KB ed25519-signed capsule: axes, values, sample counts, timestamps, and a hash chain to prior cards. It is measurement, not certification — we grade, we don't vouch.

Card live sample: h3k-2026-08-20T0422.json (7,412 B, ed25519) · verify API

Step 2 — verify offline (no account, no trust)

  1. Fetch the cardcurl -L https://meok.ai/cards/h3k-2026-08-20T0422.json
  2. Get the trust rootcurl https://csoai.org/.well-known/did.json (Ed25519 keys)
  3. Check the signature — verify sig_b64 over body_sha256 with the published key. Recompute the hash: it must match body_sha256.
  4. Check the chain — the card's prev link must match the previous card's hash (no gaps, no rewrites).
  5. Reproduce a number — the flagged axes link to the live board (councilof.ai/api/gspc); re-run the metric yourself.
You can reproduce every step on a laptop with openssl and curl. Nothing here needs us to be online.

Underwriting Data Feed Licence — the lead product

The reg-deadline feed composed into an underwriting input table: every AI-regulation deadline with legal basis, status, and penalty exposure — the exact figures (€35M/7%, €15M/3%, $1M/$3M Illinois…) that make policy conditions and parametric triggers contractible. Rendered live from councilof.ai/api/regulation; quarterly re-verified, corrections appended never edited. This needs no signed receipt — it is the data an underwriter can use tomorrow.

Loading regulation feed…

Feed: /api/regulation · licence: annual subscription + API (~$10k floor scaling to low-six-figures per the reference-data market) · no money from anything we measure.

Live measured provisions — the underwriting input

Rendered live from the signed board API (councilof.ai/api/gspc) — numbers derive from the manifest, never hand-typed. Provision-conformance is deterministic (Design Law 1: no LLM judge); market context is reported alongside, never fused.

Loading live board…

Full board: /api/gspc · methodology DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21991104 — cite the concept DOI, it always resolves to the latest version.

Loss-context language — what the card does and doesn't say

Claim typeCard saysCard does NOT say
Data fidelity MEASUREDRel-L2 error 0.072 on held-out real windows (u,v channels)No "safe" or "certified" claim
Physics consistency MEASUREDMVPE 0.043 (wake profile), TKE 0.58 (fluctuation energy)No fitness-for-purpose warranty
Runtime MEASURED13 ms/step vs 729 ms numerical referenceNo throughput SLA
Uncertainty MEASUREDSPS 50.7 with calibrated intervals (coverage 85%)Intervals are not a guarantee of coverage on unseen regimes
Deployment LOSS CONTEXTMeasured on released data only; unseen-regime risk is the top-10 shortlist's private testNo assurance that real-world drift stays inside the measured envelope
Underwriting use: treat the card as evidence of measurement practice, not as a performance warranty. Pair it with your own validation on your own data — the point of a signed card is that you can.

What this feeds (30 Sep)

This page is the standing evidence pack. The 30 Sep underwriter exhibit adds the divergence map — measured fleet scores vs reported human baselines on the same axes — and the AIUC-1 crosswalk. Ask the chat hero for "the insurer pack" or open the front door.